MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400104643 · doi:10.48175/ijarsct-19012

AyuPredict – A Disease Prediction Model

2024· article· en· W4400104643 on OpenAlexaff
Swapnil Shinde, Shivani Moghe, Sejal Patil, R Naik, Parimal Mate

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Advanced Research in Science Communication and Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBig Data and Digital Economy
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiseaseComputer scienceMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The AyuPredict model is a machine learning-based healthcare system designed to predict diseases and provide Ayurvedic treatment recommendations. This system aims to bridge the gap in healthcare accessibility, particularly in remote areas where medical facilities are scarce. The model leverages unsupervised learning algorithms, such as Random Forest, for disease prediction and supervised learning algorithms, like K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN), for recommending nearby hospitals. The system's architecture includes a user-friendly interface, disease prediction module, Ayurvedic treatment recommendation module, and hospital recommendation module. The model's performance is evaluated using accuracy metrics, with the Random Forest algorithm achieving an accuracy of 99.59% and F1 score of 99.58%. The KNN algorithm is used for hospital recommendations, providing a list of nearby hospitals based on user input. Future scope includes integrating virtual consultation platforms, voice assistants, and multilingual support to enhance accessibility and usability. The AyuPredict model has the potential to revolutionize healthcare services by providing accurate disease predictions and personalized treatment recommendations, ultimately improving patient outcomes

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.699
Threshold uncertainty score0.552

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Advanced Research in Science Communication and TechnologySame topicBig Data and Digital EconomyFrench-language works237,207