Treatment of high ammonia anaerobically digested molasses wastewater using aerobic granular sludge reactor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study addressed the treatment of high ammonia, low biodegradable chemical oxygen demand (bCOD) anaerobically digested molasses wastewater, utilizing an aerobic granular sludge (AGS) reactor. The AGS achieved 99 % ammonia removal regardless of the bCOD supplementation. By adding low ammonia (<60 mg/L), high bCOD raw molasses wastewater (before anaerobic digestion) as a carbon source, enhanced nitrogen removal, increasing from 10 % to 97 %, and improved sludge settleability via bio-induced calcite precipitation were observed. Functional genes prediction suggested two potential denitrification pathways, including heterotrophic denitrification by Paracoccus and Thauera, and autotrophic denitrification, specifically sulfide-oxidizing autotrophic denitrification by Thiobacillus. An increase in the relative abundance of microorganisms involved in heterotrophic denitrification was observed with the addition of high bCOD raw molasses wastewater. Consequently, incorporating raw molasses wastewater into the AGS presents a sustainable approach to achieve mixotrophic denitrification, maintain stable granular sludge and ensure stable treatment performance when treating anaerobically digested molasses wastewater.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".