MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400111976 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2024.3420779

IRS-Aided Secure Reliable Underwater Acoustic Communications

2024· article· en· W4400111976 on OpenAlexaff
Abdallah S. Ghazy, Georges Kaddoum, Satinder Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnderwater acoustic communicationUnderwaterComputer scienceAcousticsTelecommunicationsGeologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, there has been a growing deployment of buoyed nodes on the sea surface for tactical acoustic communications with autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs). This development necessitates the establishment of secure and reliable buoyed node-to-AUV links to safeguard sensitive information. However, existing methods such as cryptography and channel coding introduce latency and computational complexity, primarily due to the inherent challenges of acoustic communications, including limited bandwidth and low energy efficiency. To address these challenges, we propose implementing intelligent reflecting surfaces (IRSs) between buoyed nodes and AUVs, creating what we term buoyed-to-IRS-to-AUV (BIA) links. The BIA link enables secure and reliable communications by dynamically adjusting its beam widths and IRS depth in response to variations in wind and sea current speeds. In this paper, we introduce the BIA link topology, develop a comprehensive model for it, and derive a mathematical expression for the link's outage probability. Additionally, we formulate the ratio of channel secrecy rate in the MAX-MIN optimization problem and solve it using an exhaustive search method to ensure optimality. Our numerical results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, with the BIA link achieving an impressive 300% increase in the secrecy rate compared to the buoyed-AUV link.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.941

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207