Varietal Performance on Flowering of Different Varieties of Mango (<i>Mangifera indica</i>) at Sarlahi, Nepal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Floral characteristics of 10 mango varieties were studied during February-June, 2023.Distinct variations were found among the studied varieties.Significant variation were observed in term of length of inflorescence, width of inflorescence, number of male flower per inflorescence, number of female flower per inflorescence, sex ratio, % male flower, % hermaphrodite flower ranging from 20.9 cm to 31.9 cm, 11.3 cm to 19.7 cm, 279 to 1,363, 59 to 230.7, 1.25 to 19.63, 50.8% to 94.1% and 5.93% to 49.24%, respectively.The result revealed in all varieties inflorescence position were found terminal and flowers were of pentamerous type.Jarda has the longest inflorescence (31.9 cm).Dasheri has the widest inflorescence (19.7 cm).Male flowers were more than hermaphrodite flowers across the varieties.Amrapali has the highest number of hermaphrodite flower (230.7).Bombay has the highest number of male flowers (1,363) and highest sex ratio (19.63).From this study, it can be inferred that Amrapali will have more fruit set as it has highest number of hermaphrodite flowers.The findings of the study will be beneficial for breeding purpose while developing new varieties of superior quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".