MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400146229 · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33764

Therapeutic and prognostic effect of disulfidptosis-related genes in lung adenocarcinoma

2024· article· en· W4400146229 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Changshuan Li, Chao Sun, Yakun Li, Lin Dong, Xian Wang, Ruixin Li, Junjie Su, Qiong Cao, Shiyong Xin

Bibliographic record

VenueHeliyon · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFerroptosis and cancer prognosis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistère de l’Éducation, Gouvernement de l’Ontario
KeywordsAdenocarcinomaGeneOncologyInternal medicineLungMedicineLung cancerCancer researchBiologyComputational biologyGeneticsCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Disulfidptosis, a new form of cell death, may be induced by disulfide stress associated with cystine disulfide buildup, which can promote cell toxicity, leading to cell death. Nevertheless, the role of direct prognosis and the mechanism underlying the regulation of disulfidptosis-related genes (DRGs) in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) are still unknown. This study aimed to investigate the role of DRGs in LUAD prognosis and diagnosis through multiomics analysis. First, copy number variations (CNVs) and mutations in the 10 genes were assessed. Considering that five differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were associated with disulfidptosis, a novel DRG score that can be utilized to anticipate LUAD prognosis was developed. Next, the generated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and survival curves demonstrated that the model had an excellent predictive quality in LUAD in both the training and validation cohorts. Meanwhile, substantial functional disparities between the high DRG group and the low DRG group were observed, and the second gap mitosis (G2M) checkpoint, E2 promoter-binding factor (E2F) targets, and myelocytomatosis (MYC) target activities were consistently higher in the high DRG group than in the low DRG group. Additionally, the T-cell dysfunction score and tumor inflammation signature (Merck18) were negatively correlated with DRGs, whereas myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) were positively correlated with DRGs. Moreover, DRGs were negatively linked to most of the immunological checkpoints. Meanwhile, samples of low DRGs benefited more from immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). The correlation analysis between DRGs and clinical characteristics revealed increasing malignancy with increasing DRG scores. Drug sensitization experiment results indicated that sensitivity to cisplatin, vincristine, docetaxel, and gemcitabine was higher in the high DRG group than in the low DRG group. The function of model genes in LUAD was also verified using immunohistochemistry, quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), western blotting, 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EDU), and clonogenic formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.240
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeliyonSame topicFerroptosis and cancer prognosisFrench-language works237,207