MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400149791 · doi:10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.102598

Oat-Derived Bioactives (Avenanthramide and Beta-glucan) Increase the Velocity of and Accelerate Wound Healing

2024· article· en· W4400149791 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
William W. Li, Abigail A. Miller, Hudson C. Kussie, Kellen Chen, Geoffrey C. Gurtner, Vincent W. Li

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Developments in Nutrition · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicWound Healing and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeta-glucanGlucanWound healingChemistryBiophysicsBiochemistryMedicineBiologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: Oats (Avena sativa) are an important whole grain with lipid lowering and anti-inflammatory effects. Recent studies revealed that oat-derived bioactives, avenanthramide (AVE) and beta-glucan (βG), stimulate wound healing by inducing angiogenesis and recruiting endothelial progenitor cells. We here report the effect of AVE and βG on healing velocity and acceleration, characterizing wound healing dynamics. Methods: AVE and βG extracted from whole oats were solubilized in buffer (0.1%, 0.5%, 1%) and applied by SQ injection to the margins of full-thickness excisional wounds on the dorsum of C57BL/6 mice every two days and compared to controls. Surface planimetry was assessed using digital photographs taken every two post-operative days. The velocity of wound healing (Δwound area/Δtime) induced by each bioactive was calculated by linear regression as the slope between time points; acceleration (Δvelocity/Δtime) was determined as a higher order curve. Results: Compared to controls, both AVE and βG resulted in greater healing velocity, with distinct temporal dynamics. An early effect was observed with βG (before POD 2) while AVE had a later effect on healing velocity (after POD 2). 1% AVE resulted in the highest maximum velocity compared to control (21.7 vs.11.7), a 1.9-fold faster healing speed. Both 1% and 0.1% βG achieved comparable maximum velocities (21.4 vs and 21.3) but earlier in the healing process. Analysis of wound healing acceleration revealed differential dynamics between bioactives. Conclusions: Oat bioactives augment normal wound healing by improving wound healing dynamics. This is the first description of wound healing velocity and acceleration induced by AVE and βG, correlated with faster wound closure in vivo. Velocity and acceleration are novel metrics that characterize the dynamic biological effect of oat bioactives beyond completed wound closure. Funding Sources: AVE and βG supplied by Ceapro, Inc., Edmonton, Alberta.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.746
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Developments in NutritionSame topicWound Healing and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207