Association between sleep microarchitecture and cognition in obstructive sleep apnea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) increases the risk of cognitive impairment. Measures of sleep microarchitecture from EEG may help identify patients at risk of this complication. METHODS: Participants with suspected OSA (n = 1142) underwent in-laboratory polysomnography and completed sleep and medical history questionnaires, and tests of global cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA), memory (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, RAVLT) and information processing speed (Digit-Symbol Coding, DSC). Associations between cognitive scores and stage 2 non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep spindle density, power, frequency and %-fast (12-16Hz), odds-ratio product (ORP), normalized EEG power (EEGNP), and the delta:alpha ratio were assessed using multivariable linear regression (MLR) adjusted for age, sex, education, and total sleep time. Mediation analyses were performed to determine if sleep microarchitecture indices mediate the negative effect of OSA on cognition. RESULTS: All spindle characteristics were lower in participants with moderate and severe OSA (p ≤ .001, vs. no/mild OSA) and positively associated with MoCA, RAVLT, and DSC scores (false discovery rate corrected p-value, q ≤ 0.026), except spindle power which was not associated with RAVLT (q = 0.185). ORP during NREM sleep (ORPNREM) was highest in severe OSA participants (p ≤ .001) but neither ORPNREM (q ≥ 0.230) nor the delta:alpha ratio were associated with cognitive scores in MLR analyses (q ≥ 0.166). In mediation analyses, spindle density and EEGNP (p ≥ .048) mediated moderate-to-severe OSA's negative effect on MoCA scores while ORPNREM, spindle power, and %-fast spindles mediated OSA's negative effect on DSC scores (p ≤ .018). CONCLUSIONS: Altered spindle activity, ORP and normalized EEG power may be important contributors to cognitive deficits in patients with OSA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".