Functional assessment of knee osteoarthritis in the hospital outpatient care unit
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Osteoarthritis is a joint cartilage disease that affects a patient’s quality of life as it limits the patient’s movement, reduces the ability to work, increases emotions, and leads to long-term depression. Objective: To report the functional status of Knee OA in outpatient care at Ulin Hospital Banjarmasin, Indonesia. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted with a functional assessment of the patient's medical record data. The Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) instruments were used. Fifty-one respondents participated in the study. Result: Most respondents were female (86.27%), 50–59 years old (33.33%), and suffered from OA for less than one year (35.29%). In addition, 24 patients (47%) suffered from mild OA, and 27 patients (53%) had moderate OA, reflecting that patients might have issues with their physical function. Of all participants, 60.78% had grade three OA by Kellgren Lawrence's severity classification; others had grade two. All patients received intraarticular injections of hyaluronic acid. Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference between the WOMAC score and the gender, age, degree of OA and duration of OA. Hence, this illustrates that patients would suffer more from OA along with disease progression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it