MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400192805 · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2024-bsg.287

P205 Safety and efficacy of endo- biliary radiofrequency ablation for stent occlusion: a case series

2024· article· en· W4400192805 on OpenAlex
George Sismey, Philip Berry, Sreelakshmi Kotha

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePoster presentations · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiofrequency ablationStentAblationOcclusionBiliary stentSeries (stratigraphy)MedicineRadiologyInternal medicineGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Introduction</h3> Endo-biliary radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a novel minimally invasive intervention to treat stent occlusion in malignant biliary strictures<sup>1</sup>. Advances in oncological therapies have improved survival and tumour ingrowth into uncovered self-expanding metal stents (UcSEMS) is common and strategies to manage this are limited<sup>2</sup>. We aimed to determine the clinical outcomes of endo-biliary RFA using ELRA<sup>TM</sup> probe (Taewoong) in patients with UcSEMS occlusion. <h3>Methods</h3> Retrospective data was collected from February 2020 to March 2023 at St Thomas’ Hospital. <h3>Results</h3> 28 endo-biliary RFA’s (figure 1) were performed in 12 patients for occluded UcSEMS over this period, delivered by 3 operators. M:F ratio was 7:5 and mean age was 71. Aetiology was cholangiocarcinoma in 5, pancreatic cancer in 4, gallbladder malignancy in 1, hepatocellular cancer in 1 and metastatic breast cancer in 1. Excluding two recent cases, 60% required multiple RFA interventions. The median number of RFA’s was 2, with one patient requiring 9 sessions. One patient was excluded as there was significant parenchymal disease in addition to UcSEMS occlusion and despite RFA, there was progression in liver metastasis. For patients with bilirubin monitoring post RFA, 11 (100%) procedures resulted in a reduction in bilirubin between 1–4 weeks. The average reduction in bilirubin was 61.4% (6/11 patients) at week 1 and 77.4% (9/11 patients) at week 2–4. Excluding 2 recent cases, survival was 90% at 30 days post procedure, and 70% at 90 days. Survival was 100% at 90 days for cholangiocarcinoma. The patient requiring 9 sessions (not on chemotherapy), survived for 18 months with significantly improved quality of life. There were no recorded complications. Technical difficulties were encountered in 2 cases due to impedance in bilobar stents with a Y configuration due to contact of the probe with metal at the hilum. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Endo-biliary RFA had good technical and clinical success with measurable reduction in bilirubin in patients with UcSEMS occlusion without any complications in our cohort. It is difficult to say if survival is purely due to biliary drainage or if there is an anti-tumour effect with RFA, especially given the 100% survival at 3 months in patients with cholangiocarcinoma. Additional data from randomised controlled trials is required to assess the role of RFA in malignant strictures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.413
Threshold uncertainty score0.314

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it