MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400193359 · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2024-bsg.299

P217 Effectiveness and safety of trans-arterial embolization for GI bleeding refractory to therapeutic endoscopy – a 10-year study

2024· article· en· W4400193359 on OpenAlex
Sreelakshmi Kotha, Lynn Affarah, Safa Al‐Musawi, Usman Raja, Philip Berry

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePoster presentations · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefractory (planetary science)MedicineTherapeutic endoscopyArterial EmbolizationEndoscopyEmbolizationSurgeryMaterials scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Introduction</h3> Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common clinical scenario with significant mortality and morbidity. Endoscopic therapy remains the primary option, but lack of control or early rebleeding occurs in 7–16%. With evolution of interventional radiology (IR) and techniques such as microcatheters and new embolic agents, transarterial embolization (TAE) has emerged as second line treatment for uncontrolled UGIB. We evaluated clinical indications, technical success, complications, rebleeding and mortality following TAE in UGIB where endotherapy failed or was not feasible. <h3>Methods</h3> Retrospective analysis of patients presenting with UGIB and requiring TAE over 10 years in a tertiary centre. UGIB was defined as clinically significant, acute blood loss from a gastrointestinal source diagnosed by endoscopy and/or CT scan. Demographic, clinical and procedural data were collected from electronic medical records. <h3>Results</h3> 78 patients required TAE over the 10-year period. Demographic data is shown in table 1. 49 patients had an endoscopy pre-TAE where active bleeding was visualised in 45. Median red blood cell transfusion was 5 units. Major target for TAE was gastroduodenal artery (n=51) and other targets included superior mesenteric (n=10), inferior mesenteric (n=5), right gastric (n=2), left gastric (n=1), splenic (n=3), right hepatic (n=2), left hepatic (n=1) and gastroepiploic (n=3) arteries. Technical success was 100%. 17 patients rebled (22%), with 5 undergoing surgery, 6 patients being successfully re-treated with endotherapy and 4 patients being referred for repeat TAE. 2 patients were treated conservatively. 46 patients (59%) required high dependency or intensive care admission with the median length of admission of 4 days. The median length of hospital stay was 14 days. Survival during admission was 67% (n=52). Intraprocedural complications were seen in 6% (n=5) and included non-target embolization and coil migration. Post procedure complications included bowel ischaemia in 2 patients, haematoma at puncture site in 4 and acute kidney injury in 11 patients. Bowel ischaemia resolved spontaneously. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Management of UGIB refractory to endotherapy remains a challenge and requires a multi-disciplinary approach by endoscopists, interventional radiologists, surgeons and intensivists. Mortality is high (33%) in this group. There have been significant advances in interventional radiology techniques and devices and TAE is a safe and effective therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.315
Threshold uncertainty score0.345

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it