How Static and Cyclic Loading Affect the Mechanical Properties of the Porcine Annulus Fibrosus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study sought to evaluate the effects of prolonged cyclic loading on the tissue-level mechanical properties of the spinal annulus fibrosus. Functional spinal units (FSUs) were obtained from porcine cervical spines at the C3-C4 and C5-C6 levels. Following a 15-min preload of 300 N of axial compression, the FSUs were split into three groups: the cyclic loading group cycled between 0.35 MPa and 0.95 MPa for 2 h (n = 8); the static loading group was compressed at 0.65 MPa for 2 h (n = 10); and a control group which only underwent the 300 N preload (n = 11). Following loading, samples of the annulus were excised to perform intralamellar tensile testing and interlamellar 180 deg peel tests. Variables analyzed from the intralamellar test were stress and strain at the end of the toe region, stress and strain at initial failure (yield point), Young's modulus, ultimate stress, and strain at ultimate stress. Variables evaluated from the interlamellar tests were lamellar adhesion strength, adhesion strength variability, and stiffness. The analysis showed no significant differences between conditions on any measured variable; however, there was a trend (p = 0.059) that cyclically loaded tissues had increased adhesion strength variability compared to the static and control conditions. The main finding of this study is that long-duration axial loading did not impact the intra- or interlamellar mechanical properties of the porcine annulus. A trend of increased adhesion strength variability in cyclically loaded samples could indicate a potential predisposition of the annulus to delamination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".