Vicarious resilience in ethnic identity among BIPOC counsellors and psychotherapists working with attempted genocide survivors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BIPOC counsellors and psychotherapists share experiences of identity threats their clients of color face. Refugee attempted genocide survivors have faced the most severe identity threats: persecution of their entire ethnic group, yet they have demonstrated remarkable resilience. Vicarious resilience occurs when client resilience following trauma or adversity is transferred onto the counsellor. The purpose of this qualitative study was to examine vicarious resilience in ethnic identity development among BIPOC counsellors who recently worked with a resilient refugee attempted genocide survivor. Five counsellors who were racial/ethnic minority group members participated in semi-structured interviews analyzed via thematic analysis. The counsellors were emotionally activated by the intersections between their own and their clients’ identities, forcing them to face and embrace their ethnic selves, and recognize cultural strengths and values that can function as “Roots of Survival”. Changes in professional practice were also reported, involving empowering clients to further develop their own identities, and engaging in psychoeducation and advocacy related to oppression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".