MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400221191 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1616

Anisotropies in the spatial distribution and kinematics of dwarf galaxies in the Local Group and beyond

2024· article· en· W4400221191 on OpenAlexaff
Isabel Santos-Santos, Julio F. Navarro, Alan W. McConnachie

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstronomy and Astrophysical Research
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of AstrophysicsUniversity of Victoria
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilScience and Technology Facilities Council
KeywordsPhysicsLocal GroupAstrophysicsDwarf galaxyGalaxyAstronomyKinematicsAnisotropySpatial distributionGroup (periodic table)Galaxy groupGalaxy formation and evolutionClassical mechanicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The mass distribution in the Local Group (LG), dominated by the Andromeda (M31) and Milky Way (MW) pair, is highly anisotropic. We use the APOSTLE simulations to examine how this anisotropy manifests on the spatial distribution and kinematics of dwarf galaxies out to a distance of $d_{\rm MW}\sim 3$ Mpc from the MW. The simulations indicate a preference for dwarfs to be located near the axis defined by the MW-M31 direction, even for dwarfs in the LG periphery (LGP; i.e. at distances $1.25\ \lt\ d_{\rm MW}/$Mpc $\lt\ 3$). The ‘Hubble flow’ in the periphery is also affected; at fixed $d_{\rm MW}$ the mean recession speed, $\langle V_{\rm rad} \rangle$, varies with angular distance to M31, peaking in the anti-M31 direction and reaching a minimum behind M31. The M31-MW mass decelerates the local expansion; the LG ‘turnaround radius’ (i.e. where $\langle V_{\rm rad} \rangle =0$) in APOSTLE is at $r \sim 1.25$ Mpc from the LG barycentre and the pure Hubble flow (where $\langle V_{\rm rad} \rangle \sim H_0*d$) is reached beyond $r\sim 3$ Mpc. The predicted flow is very cold, with a barycentric dispersion of $\lt 40$ km s−1. Comparing these predictions with observations yields mixed results. There is little evidence for a preferred alignment of dwarfs along the MW-M31 direction, but some evidence for an angular anisotropy in $\langle V_{\rm rad} \rangle$. Although the ‘coldness’ of the Hubble flow is consistent with the simulations, it is less decelerated: relative to the MW all galaxies beyond $d_{\rm MW} \sim 1.25$ Mpc seem to be already on a pure Hubble flow. We argue that these oddities may result at least partly from incompleteness and inhomogeneous sky coverage in our current inventory of nearby dwarfs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score0.320

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchFrench-language works237,207