MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4400231542 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad429c

The Next Generation Deep Extragalactic Exploratory Public Near-infrared Slitless Survey Epoch 1 (NGDEEP-NISS1): Extragalactic Star-formation and Active Galactic Nuclei at 0.5 < z < 3.6

2024· article· en· W4400231542 on OpenAlexaff
Nor Pirzkal, Barry Rothberg, Casey Papovich, Lu Shen, Gene C. K. Leung, Micaela B. Bagley, Steven L. Finkelstein, Brittany N. Vanderhoof, Jennifer M. Lotz, Anton M. Koekemoer, Nimish P. Hathi, Y. Cheng, Nikko J. Cleri, Norman A. Grogin, L. Y. Aaron Yung, Mark Dickinson, Henry C. Ferguson, Jonathan P. Gardner, Intae Jung, Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe, Russell E. Ryan, Raymond C. Simons, Swara Ravindranath, Danielle A. Berg, Bren E. Backhaus, Caitlin M. Casey, M. Castellano, Katherine Chworowsky, Isabella G. Cox, Romeel Davé, Kelcey Davis, Vicente Estrada-Carpenter, A. Fontana, Seiji Fujimoto, Mauro Giavalisco, A. Grazian, Taylor A. Hutchison, Anne E. Jaskot, Lisa J. Kewley, Allison Kirkpatrick, Dale D. Kocevski, Rebecca L. Larson, Jasleen Matharu, Priyamvada Natarajan, L. Pentericci, Pablo G. Pérez‐González, Gregory F. Snyder, Rachel S. Somerville, Jonathan R. Trump, Stephen M. Wilkins

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's University
FundersNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationScience and Technology Facilities CouncilSpace Telescope Science InstituteNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsActive galactic nucleusGalaxyRedshiftAstronomyStar formationPhotometry (optics)Spectral energy distributionSupermassive black holeLuminous infrared galaxyMetallicityGalaxy formation and evolutionStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Next Generation Deep Extragalactic Exploratory Public (NGDEEP) survey program was designed specifically to include Near Infrared Slitless Spectroscopic observations (NGDEEP-NISS) to detect multiple emission lines in as many galaxies as possible and across a wide redshift range using the Near Infrared Imager and Slitless Spectrograph. We present early results obtained from the first set of observations (Epoch 1, 50% of the allocated orbits) of this program (NGDEEP-NISS1). Using a set of independently developed calibration files designed to deal with a complex combination of overlapping spectra, multiple position angles, and multiple cross filters and grisms, in conjunction with a robust and proven algorithm for quantifying contamination from overlapping dispersed spectra, NGDEEP-NISS1 has achieved a 3σ sensitivity limit of 2 × 10−18 erg s−1 cm−2. We demonstrate the power of deep wide field slitless spectroscopy (WFSS) to characterize the star formation rates, and metallicity ([O iii]/Hβ), and dust content, of galaxies at 1 < z < 3.5. The latter showing intriguing initial results on the applicability and assumptions made regarding the use of Case B recombination. Further, we identify the presence of active galactic nuclei and infer the mass of their supermassive black holes using broadened restframe Mg ii and Hβ emission lines. The spectroscopic results are then compared with the physical properties of galaxies extrapolated from fitting spectral energy distribution models to photometry alone. The results clearly demonstrate the unique power and efficiency of WFSS at near-infrared wavelengths over other methods to determine the properties of galaxies across a broad range of redshifts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→