MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400235398 · doi:10.11159/iccste24.255

Case Slope Stability Planning and Structural Strengthening of Fuel Storage Tanks in Kalimantan, Indonesia

2024· article· en· W4400235398 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Conference on Civil, Structural and Transportation Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil, Finite Element Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStability (learning theory)Petroleum engineeringEnvironmental scienceMining engineeringGeotechnical engineeringGeologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The slope stability planning for manufacturing fuel storage tanks in Kalimantan, Indonesia, involves various crucial steps.It begins with a comprehensive understanding of soil characteristics, including its type, pressure tolerance, and considerations for the surrounding environment.Material selection, structural design, and adherence to safety standards are paramount in ensuring the construction's safety and resilience against landslides and environmental damage.A notable challenge arises from a steep excavation slope, particularly at an elevation of +8.00 in the tank area.To mitigate risks, meticulous planning for retaining walls and similar structures becomes necessary to ensure the tank's construction and operation remain undisturbed.The research primarily analyses the slope stability between zones A and B, particularly on the western side with an elevation of +35 meters.Findings reveal that the existing conditions fail to meet the minimum safety factor requirements, indicating potential instability when applied to operational loads.Zones A and B exhibit safety factors below 1.50, suggesting a heightened risk of collapse under load.The study proposes a comprehensive reinforcement plan encompassing various stages to address these concerns.These include Soldier Pile 1 Construction, Soil Nailing, Slope Excavation at +8.0 meters, L-shape wall Construction, and considerations for Operational Loads and Earthquake Conditions (Pseudostatic).Detailed analyses of maximum bending moment and maximum deflection inform the selection and design of reinforcement components.Components such as Soldier Piles, L-shape walls, and Soil Nailing are carefully evaluated for their moment capacity and short-term and long-term deflection characteristics to meet safety requirements.Overall, the safety factor, maximum bending moment, and maximum lateral deflection values fall within acceptable short and long-term limits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.538
Threshold uncertainty score0.615

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it