MOTAI: A Novel Method for the Study of O-GalNAcylation and Complex O-Glycosylation in Cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Tn antigen, an immature truncated O-glycosylation, is a promising biomarker for cancer detection and diagnosis. However, reliable methods for analyzing O-GalNAcylation and complex O-glycosylation are lacking. Here, we develop a novel method, MOTAI, for the sequential analysis of O-glycosylation using different O-glycoproteases. MOTAI conjugates glycopeptides on a solid support and releases different types of O-glycosylation through sequential enzymatic digestion by O-glycoproteases, including OpeRATOR and IMPa. Because OpeRATOR has less activity on O-GalNAcylation, MOTAI enriches O-GalNAcylation for subsequent analysis. We demonstrate the effectiveness of MOTAI by analyzing fetuin O-glycosylation and Jurkat cell lines. We then apply MOTAI to analyze colorectal cancer and benign colorectal polyps. We identify 32 Tn/sTn-glycoproteins and 43 T/sT-glycoproteins that are significantly increased in tumor tissues. Gene Ontology analysis reveals that most of these proteins are ECM proteins involved in the adhesion process of the intercellular matrix. Additionally, the protein disulfide isomerase CRELD2 has a significant difference in Tn expression, and the abnormally glycosylated T345 and S349 O-glycosylation sites in cancer group samples may promote the secretion of CRELD2 and ultimately tumorigenesis through ECM reshaping. In summary, MOTAI provides a powerful new tool for the in-depth analysis of O-GalNAcylation and complex O-glycosylation. It also reveals the upregulation of Tn/sTn-glycoproteins in colorectal cancer, which may provide new insights into cancer biology and biomarker discovery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".