MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400257113 · doi:10.1002/pbc.31129

The impact of comparative genomic hybridization/single‐nucleotide polymorphism microarray in risk stratification of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia

2024· article· en· W4400257113 on OpenAlexafffund
Antoine Gourmel, Héloïse Perrault, Marie‐Laure Colaiacovo, Louise Laramée, Marieke Rozendaal, Henrique Bittencourt, Caroline Laverdière, Josette Champagne, Sonia Cellot, Lewis B. Silverman, Emmanuelle Lemyre, Catalina Maftei, Géraldine Mathonnet, Frédérique Tihy, Marie‐Claude Pelland‐Marcotte, France Léveillé, Thai Hoa Tran

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Blood & Cancer · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéFondation Charles-BruneauCole Foundation
KeywordsETV6MedicineSNPCDKN2ASNP arrayConcordanceSingle-nucleotide polymorphismOncologyComparative genomic hybridizationFluorescence in situ hybridizationHazard ratioKaryotypeInternal medicineGeneticsConfidence intervalBiologyChromosomal translocationChromosomeGenotypeGeneCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The objective of this study is to assess the concordance and added value of combined comparative genomic hybridization plus single‐nucleotide polymorphism microarray (CGH/SNP) analyses in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) risk stratification compared to conventional cytogenetic methods. Procedure This is a retrospective study that included patients aged 1–18 years diagnosed with de novo ALL at Sainte‐Justine Hospital between 2016 and 2021. Results from conventional cytogenetic and molecular analyses were collected and compared to those of CGH/SNP. Results A total of 135 ALL patients were included. Sample failures or non‐diagnostic analyses occurred in 17.8% cases with G‐banding karyotypes versus 1.5% cases with CGH/SNP. The mean turnaround time for results was significantly faster for CGH/SNP than karyotype with 5.8 versus 10.7 days, respectively. The comparison of ploidy assessment by CGH/SNP and G‐banding karyotype showed strong concordance (r = .82, p < .001, r2 = .68). Furthermore, G‐banding karyotype did not detect additional clinically relevant aberrations that were missed by the combined analysis of CGH/SNP and fluorescence in situ hybridization. The most common gene alterations detected by CGH/SNP were deletions involving CDKN2A (35.8%), ETV6 (31.3%), CDKN2B (28.4%), PAX5 (20.1%), IKZF1 (12.7%), and copy‐neutral loss of heterozygosity (CN‐LOH) of 9p (9.0%). Among these, only ETV6 deletion was found to have a significant prognostic impact with superior event‐free survival in both univariate and multivariate analyses (adjusted hazard ratio 0.08, 95% confidence interval: 0.01–0.50, p = .02). Conclusion CGH/SNP provided faster, reliable, and highly concordant results than those obtained by conventional cytogenetics. CGH/SNP identified recurrent gene deletions in pediatric ALL, of which ETV6 deletion conferred a favorable prognosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Blood & CancerSame topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207