Cooling Lithium-Ion Batteries in the Presence of Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces Structure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Lithium-ion batteries are receiving much attention for powering different electrical systems. During charging and discharging, heat generated may cause a fire. Maintaining a low surface temperature is crucial for the safety of the batteries. The uniform temperature distribution is critical to achieve. Flow through the channel has been used for the active cooling of batteries. Air, water and nanofluid are the fluids utilized in the dynamic cooling system. In the present study, we replace the channel configuration with a triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS) sheet made of AlSi10Mg with a thickness of 1 cm. The heat generated using 1C and 4C class of batteries is used. The numerical simulation using COMSOL software investigated different types of TPMS thermal performance. A solid gyroid network is the most suitable for such an application compared to a diamond network and I-graph and wrapped package graph (IWP) network for identical porosity. It is found that besides uniform temperature distribution compared to traditional channel configuration, there is an increase of the Nusselt number of 85% compared to the channel configuration. The performance evaluation criteria are increased by 40% compared to the channel configuration. The surface area of the TPMS plays a crucial role in heat extraction. Two parameters that confirmed the performance of the solid gyroid network are the performance evaluation criterion and the perforated ratio. Both indicated that the reliable gyroid network having a porosity of 0.5 is more effective in heat removal for this application.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".