MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400265273 · doi:10.7759/cureus.63617

The Importance of Psychological Assessment in the Management of Bladder Pain Syndrome/Interstitial Cystitis and Vulvodynia: A Case Report

2024· article· en· W4400265273 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nobuo Okui, Machiko Okui

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVulvodyniaMedicineInterstitial cystitisBladder Pain SyndromeDermatologyPelvic painPathologySurgeryAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This case report emphasizes the crucial role of psychological assessment in the management of patients with bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis (BPS/IC) and vulvodynia. A 48-year-old woman with a five-year history of refractory BPS/IC and vulvodynia presented with frequent urination, pelvic pain, and severe dyspareunia, which led to sexual aversion and divorce from her partner. Previous treatments, including lifestyle modifications, analgesics, anticholinergics, hydrodistension, intravesical dimethyl sulfoxide, and psychiatric interventions, had been ineffective. Psychological assessments using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, and Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 revealed severe symptoms of depression, anxiety, and alexithymia. Due to the patient's sexual aversion and the absence of a partner, a complete Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) could not be administered. Instead, a partial FSFI and artificial intelligence-translated reference value of the Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised were used to assess aspects relevant to the patient's condition. The patient underwent three monthly sessions of Fotona laser therapy, erbium, and neodymium laser at one-month intervals. Treatment outcomes were evaluated using the Numeric Rating Scale-11, Vulvodynia Total, Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index, and psychological assessment tools. At the six-month follow-up, all physical and psychological symptoms showed significant improvement and complete remission was achieved at 12 months. Despite the overall positive treatment outcomes, the patient's sexual aversion persisted, and accurate measurement was not possible, highlighting the complexity of addressing sexual function in patients with BPS/IC and vulvodynia. This case report underscores the need for a holistic approach to managing these conditions, addressing both the physical and psychological aspects of the disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0080.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchFrench-language works237,207