MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400266071 · doi:10.1002/cphc.202400573

Rotational Spectroscopy of the Acetone‐Water Complex: Large Amplitude Motions

2024· article· en· W4400266071 on OpenAlexafffund
Jiao Gao, Colton D. Carlson, Javix Thomas, Yunjie Xu, Wolfgang Jäger

Bibliographic record

VenueChemPhysChem · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMolecular Spectroscopy and Structure
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsAcetoneChemistrySpectroscopyChemical physicsMoleculeRotational spectroscopyComputational chemistryMolecular dynamicsCovalent bondQuantum tunnellingWater dimerHydrogen bondPhysicsOrganic chemistryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Acetone (CH3COCH3), the simplest ketone, has recently attracted considerable attention for its important role in atmospheric chemistry and in the formation of ices in extraterrestrial sources that contain complex organic molecules. In this study, we employed a combination of experimental rotational spectroscopy and quantum chemistry calculations to investigate the structure and dynamics of the acetone‐water complex. Our aim was to understand how non‐covalent interactions with water affect the methyl internal rotation dynamics of acetone, and how water‐centered large amplitude motions alter the observed physical properties compared to those predicted at the equilibrium position. Detailed rotation‐tunneling analyses of acetone‐H2O and ‐D2O reveal that the interactions with water disrupt the equivalence of the two methyl rotors, resulting in a noticeably lower methyl rotor barrier for the top with the close‐by water compared to that of free acetone. The barrier for the methyl group further from water is also lower, although to a lesser degree. To gain further insights, extensive theoretical modelling was conducted, focusing on the associated large amplitude motions. Furthermore, quantum theory of atoms in molecules and non‐covalent interactions analyses were utilized to visualize the underlying causes of the observed trends.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemPhysChemSame topicMolecular Spectroscopy and StructureFrench-language works237,207