MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4400293035 · doi:10.1161/jaha.123.032321

Days Alive and Out of Hospital as an Outcome Measure in Patients Receiving Hyperacute Stroke Intervention

2024· article· en· W4400293035 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joseph E. Donnelly, Jae Beom Hong, Luke Boyle, Vivien Yong, William K. Diprose, Jakob Meyer, Doug Campbell, P. Alan Barber

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Heart Association · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNeurological Foundation of New Zealand
KeywordsIntervention (counseling)Stroke (engine)MedicineMeasure (data warehouse)Outcome (game theory)Physical therapyEmergency medicinePediatricsPsychiatryMathematicsComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Patient outcome after stroke is frequently assessed with clinical scales such as the modified Rankin Scale score (mRS). Days alive and out of hospital at 90 days (DAOH‐90), which measures survival, time spent in hospital or rehabilitation settings, readmission and institutionalization, is an objective outcome measure that can be obtained from large administrative data sets without the need for patient contact. We aimed to assess the comparability of DAOH with mRS and its relationship with other prognostic variables after acute stroke reperfusion therapy. Methods and Results Consecutive patients with ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular thrombectomy were analyzed. DAOH‐90 was calculated from a national minimum data set, a mandatory nationwide administrative database. mRS score at day 90 (mRS‐90) was assessed with in‐person or telephone interviews. The study included 1278 patients with ischemic stroke (714 male, median age 70 [59–79], median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 14 [9–20]). Median DAOH‐90 was 71 [29–84] and median mRS‐90 score was 3 [2–5]. DAOH‐90 was correlated with admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (Spearman rho −0.44, P <0.001) and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT [Computed Tomography] Score (Spearman rho 0.24, P <0.001). There was a strong association between mRS‐90 and DAOH‐90 (Spearman rho correlation −0.79, P <0.001). Area under receiver operating curve for predicting mRS score >0 was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.84–0.88), mRS score >1 was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.86–0.90) and mRS score >2 was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.89–0.92). Conclusions In patients with stroke treated with reperfusion therapies, DAOH‐90 shows reasonable comparability to the more established outcome measure of mRS‐90. DAOH‐90 can be readily obtained from administrative databases and therefore has the potential to be used in large‐scale clinical trials and comparative effectiveness studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Heart Association→Same topicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery→French-language works237,207→