MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400298903 · doi:10.1097/mop.0000000000001380

What's new in pediatric genetic cholestatic liver disease: advances in etiology, diagnostics and therapeutic approaches

2024· review· en· W4400298903 on OpenAlexaff
Michele Pinon, Binita M. Kamath

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Pediatrics · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEtiologyMedicineDiseaseIntensive care medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To highlight recent advances in pediatric cholestatic liver disease, including promising novel prognostic markers and new therapies. FINDINGS: Additional genetic variants associated with the progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) phenotype and new genetic cholangiopathies, with an emerging role of ciliopathy genes, are increasingly being identified. Genotype severity predicts outcomes in bile salt export pump (BSEP) deficiency, and post-biliary diversion serum bile acid levels significantly affect native liver survival in BSEP and progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 1 (FIC1 deficiency) patients. Heterozygous variants in the MDR3 gene have been associated with various cholestatic liver disease phenotypes in adults. Ileal bile acid transporter (IBAT) inhibitors, approved for pruritus in PFIC and Alagille Syndrome (ALGS), have been associated with improved long-term quality of life and event-free survival. SUMMARY: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have revolutionized diagnostic approaches, while discovery of new intracellular signaling pathways show promise in identifying therapeutic targets and personalized strategies. Bile acids may play a significant role in hepatic damage progression, suggesting their monitoring could guide cholestatic liver disease management. IBAT inhibitors should be incorporated early into routine management algorithms for pruritus. Data are emerging as to whether IBAT inhibitors are impacting disease biology and modifying the natural history of the cholestasis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in PediatricsSame topicDrug Transport and Resistance MechanismsFrench-language works237,207