Detailed phenotype and long-term follow-up of <i>RAB28-</i> associated cone-rod dystrophy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose To gain an insight into the pathophysiology of RAB28-associated inherited retinal degeneration through detailed phenotyping and long-term longitudinal follow-up.Methods The patient underwent complete ophthalmic examinations. Visual function was assessed with microperimetry, full-field electroretinography (ffERG), imaging with optical coherence tomography (OCT), short-wave (SW), and near-infrared (NIR) fundus autofluorescence (FAF).Results A healthy Haitian woman with homozygous pathogenic variants (c.68C > T; p.Ser23Phe) in RAB28 presented at 16 years of age with a four-year history of blurred vision. Visual acuities were 20/125 in each eye, which remained relatively stable since. At age 27, cone ffERGs were non-detectable and borderline for rod-mediated responses. Kinetic fields were full to a V-4e target, undetectable to a small I-4e stimulus. Microperimetry showed an absolute central scotoma surrounded by a pericentral relative scotoma. SD-OCT showed an undetectable or barely detectable foveal and parafoveal photoreceptor outer nuclear layer (ONL), photoreceptor outer segment (POS), and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) signals and loss of the SW- and NIR-FAF signals. This atrophic region was separated from a normally laminated retina by a narrow transition zone (TZ) of hyper SW- and NIR-FAF that co-localized with preserved ONL but abnormally thinned POS and RPE. There was minimal centrifugal (<100 μm) expansion over a six-year period.Conclusion The cone-rod dystrophy phenotype documented herein supports a critical role of RAB28 for cone function and POS maintenance. Severe central photoreceptor and RPE loss with a predilection for POS loss in TZs suggests possible disruptions of complex mechanisms that maintain central cone photoreceptor and RPE homeostasis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".