MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Spatially and temporally differentiated characterization factors for supply risk of abiotic resources in life cycle assessment

2024· article· en· W4400312105 on OpenAlexaff
Anish Koyamparambath, Philippe Loubet, Steven B. Young, Guido Sonnemann

Bibliographic record

VenueResources Conservation and Recycling · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersEIT RawMaterials
KeywordsLife-cycle assessmentProduct (mathematics)Environmental economicsRaw materialResource (disambiguation)Supply chainProduction (economics)Natural resource economicsEnvironmental scienceIndustrial ecologySupply and demandEnvironmental resource managementBusinessEconomicsComputer scienceSustainabilityEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• The GeoPolRisk method assesses Geopolitical Supply Risk from the perspective of a country, region, or economic block in a specific year and allows integration of mineral resource supply risk in Life Cycle Assessment. • The Geopolitical Supply Risk potential developed for 46 raw materials is applicable to elementary flows, similar to other life cycle impact assessment methods. • Characterization factors in the GeoPolRisk method highlight precious metals, particularly platinum group metals (PGMs), due to high market prices and production concentration in geopolitically unstable regions. • The study underscores the importance of considering spatial and temporal variations in characterization factors, providing a nuanced assessment of supply risk associated with the product system. • A case study on photovoltaic laminate production highlights gallium, copper, and tin as significant contributors to supply risk. Life cycle assessment, a comprehensive tool to evaluate environmental impacts across a product's life cycle, traditionally focuses on "inside-out" impacts caused by the product on the environment, emphasizing resource use, global warming, and other environmental impacts. In contrast, the "outside-in" perspective considers resource availability and accessibility to industry. This second perspective was developed as a way to integrate raw material criticality assessment into LCA. The GeoPolRisk method assesses the supply risk based on global production concentration, import shares, political stability scores, and the average price of the commodity. This article introduces a characterization model for the GeoPolRisk method and calculates the Geopolitical Supply Risk Potential of using 46 raw materials across different countries in multiple years. The characterization factors show the highest values for precious metals, like platinum group metals (PGMs), reflecting their high market prices and concentrated production in geopolitically unstable regions. The results emphasize the significance of spatial and temporal variations in characterization factors, providing a nuanced assessment of supply risk of raw materials associated with the product system. Despite data limitations, the characterization factors offer a good estimate of the supply risk of raw materials available for use in product systems. A case study on photovoltaic laminate production highlights gallium, copper, and tin as significant contributors to supply risk. From an "outside-in" perspective, the case study demonstrates how the GeoPolRisk method complements traditional environmental indicators such as global warming, making it a valuable tool for assessing mineral resource supply risk in Life Cycle Assessment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.435

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResources Conservation and RecyclingSame topicEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207