MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400314307 · doi:10.1016/j.jfca.2024.106495

Complete characterization of the fatty acid profile of mare milk from commercial semi-extensive farms during lactation

2024· article· en· W4400314307 on OpenAlexaff
Ana Blanco‐Doval, Luis Javier R. Barrón, John K. G. Kramer, Noelia Aldai

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Food Composition and Analysis · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Equine Medical Research
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersEusko JaurlaritzaHezkuntza, Hizkuntza Politika Eta Kultura Saila, Eusko Jaurlaritza
KeywordsLactationPolyunsaturated fatty acidFatty acidFood sciencePastureLong chainGrazingComposition (language)ChemistryBiologyAnimal scienceBiochemistryPregnancyAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study aimed to thoroughly describe the profile of fatty acids in mare milk from farms with different management systems and changes during lactation. Eighteen mares belonging to three commercial farms (6 mares per farm) were milked during the complete lactation period (six months). Fat content was determined by infrared spectroscopy, while fatty acid methyl esters were analyzed using a GC-FID. Mare milk, in general, contained 47.5 % saturated, 25.3 % monounsaturated, and 26.5 % polyunsaturated fatty acids. A high proportion of 18:2n-6 and 18:3n-3 but a low concentration of their long-chain metabolites was observed, and seven branched-chain fatty acids were identified. Stage of lactation significantly influenced the content of most individual fatty acids, and in general, milk from mares managed under pasture-based feeding systems showed a higher content of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. This study provides new insights into mare milk FA composition and into dynamics of mare milk nutritional quality as affected by lactation stage and grazing intensity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Food Composition and AnalysisSame topicVeterinary Equine Medical ResearchFrench-language works237,207