MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400320980 · doi:10.1155/2024/9117634

Development of Isoparametric Shell Elements with Variable Edge Order and Movable Nodes in the Nonlinear Hybrid Simulation of Reinforced Concrete Structures

2024· article· en· W4400320980 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueModelling and Simulation in Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStructural engineeringNonlinear systemDeflection (physics)SlabFinite element methodStiffeningReinforcementEngineeringEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionShear (geology)Shell (structure)CrackingMaterials scienceComposite materialMechanical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, nonlinear isoparametric shell elements with variable edge order and moving nodes from CBAL4M to CBAL12M were developed and integrated into FINITE. Specific mapping and surfaces for two‐dimensional isoparametric shell elements, shape functions, and their derivatives are presented. The advantage of the developed shell element is that it can represent not only the smeared reinforcement on the wall and slab but also the discrete special reinforcement that is important for crack propagation in the nonlinear simulation of RC structures. With the advantage of movable nodes, the discrete reinforcement can be effectively covered and the position of the discrete reinforcement can be determined. When modelling reinforced concrete structures dominated by shear walls, the use of variable edge orders at the slab‐wall interfaces where high stresses or forces are expected reduces the calculation time and capacity by using an optimal number of nodes for hybrid modelling. Nonlinearity is considered only in the form of material nonlinearity with a stress‐strain curve, tension stiffening, and cracking including crack rotation. The analytical model is validated by comparing the results at the element level of the Vecchio and Collins test panels at the University of Toronto and at the structural level of the five‐story shear wall building with staggered openings at the University of Michigan. Nonlinear hybrid simulations of 2D and 3D models of 2‐story and 5‐story shear wall‐dominated RC buildings are investigated with the developed element considering ultimate load curves, deflection shapes, crack patterns, stress distributions, and 3D effects and force mechanisms. For this purpose, a three‐story scaled test model was constructed and tested to simulate the seismic behavior. The test results are also compared with the analytical results of SAP2000 and the developed nonlinear shell element. The seismic capacity of the test model and the analytical models was similar at 31 tons. The developed element can be effectively used for modelling and nonlinear hybrid simulation of RC buildings and can also be applied to prestressed concrete structures for tendon modelling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score0.421

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it