MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400345586 · doi:10.1055/a-2360-9857

Longitudinal Quality-of-Life Outcomes of Skull Base Chondrosarcoma Patients following Surgical Resection

2024· article· en· W4400345586 on OpenAlexaffabout
Seika Taniguchi, Jeremy Kam, Mendel Castle‐Kirszbaum, Ryojo Akagami

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull Base · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChondrosarcomaSkullMedicineSurgical resectionResectionQuality of life (healthcare)Base (topology)SurgeryNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective Owing to the rarity of skull base chondrosarcomas (CS), much of its natural history and long-term impact on patient quality of life (QoL) are not well studied. This novel study demonstrates QoL among CS patients following radical treatment constituting surgery and postoperative radiotherapy over 2 decades. Study Design Retrospective review and prospective data collection to obtain patient demographic, tumor characteristics, clinical symptoms, and patient-reported QoL outcomes using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Setting/Participants Patients diagnosed with CS who underwent radical intent surgical resection by the senior author and adjuvant early postoperative proton beam therapy. Results Twenty-eight skull base CS patients were identified, with 19 patients completing full treatment course. Mean long-term follow-up was 148.9 months. Diplopia symptom resolution was high. No significant deterioration in SF-36 Physical Health Component (PHC) and Mental Health Component (MHC) scores was observed at postoperative and long-term follow-up. General health was stable initially but deteriorated in long term (Δ −18.88, minimal clinically important difference [MCID]: 9.86, p = 0.04). Compared with age-matched Canadian control patients, CS patients reported similar PHC scores at baseline and follow-up. CS patients reported lower MHC scores (45.8 vs. 50.9, p = 0.13) preoperatively, which persisted at follow-up decreasing by 1.9 (43.9 vs. 53.7, p = 0.03); this difference, however, did not reach MCID threshold of Δ 5.9. Conclusion We present the longest follow-up data on CS demonstrating stable long-term QoL with aggressive surgery. Tumor control was high and preoperative tumor size did not affect long-term QoL. Preoperative QoL was lower among CS compared with Canadian normative data. Postoperatively, only the decline in physical functioning QoL scores exceeded MCID. At long-term follow-up, the decline in physical functioning, social functioning, and general health exceeded MCID. Overall, QoL among CS patients remained lower at long-term follow-up despite absence of tumor progression and resolution of symptoms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.829

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull BaseSame topicBone Tumor Diagnosis and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207