MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400355172 · doi:10.1136/bmjno-2024-000724

Thrombus age does not differentiate between cardiogenic and atherosclerotic strokes

2024· article· en· W4400355172 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jens Schwarze, Sophie Schumann, Silvio Brandt, Olaf Dirsch, Bernhard Rosengarten

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Neurology Open · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThrombusCardiologyInternal medicineMedicineCardiogenic shockMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Interventional stroke therapy made thrombi available for histological analysis. Unfortunately, simple composition aspects such as erythrocyte versus fibrin/platelet rich did not allow a feasible allocation to thrombi's cardiac or carotid origin. Since the mentioned criteria represent characteristics of thrombus age, we used established histological criteria for determining thrombus age in patients who had an atherosclerotic (TOAST (Trial of Org 10172 in Acute stroke Treatment) 1) stroke versus patients who had a cardioembolic (TOAST 2) stroke. Methods: We assessed prospectively data from stroke patients presenting with occlusion of the middle cerebral artery eligible for catheter-based intervention. Besides patient characteristics and stroke workup, extracted thrombi were classified into different age categories according to their cellular to fibrotic transition. Thrombi were collected in an erythrocyte lysing solution to reduce acute clotting effects. Statistics were done with a non-parametric Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Results: 170 patients were included, of which 50 (38 men; 73±12 years) had a TOAST 1 and 99 (59 women; 75±10 years) had a TOAST 2 categorised stroke. Age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Score (13±7 vs 15±7), Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (9±3 vs 9±2), Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction Score (2.9±0.2 vs 2.9±0.3), modified Rankin Score on discharge (3.2±2 vs 3.2±2), number of vascular risk factors (0.9±1.4 vs 1.0±1.1) or time span between symptom onset to reperfusion (266±115 vs 260±128 min) remained non-significant. Also, thrombus age did not differ between the groups. The mean age of thrombi was 5-8 days. However, the male-female ratio differed significantly (p<0.0005) between groups, with more men in TOAST 1 group and more women in TOAST 2 group. Conclusion: Age aspects of thrombi seem not feasible to allow reliable source allocation. However, the young age of thrombi points to a rapid detachment. The difference in sex relation is in line with previous reports.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Neurology OpenSame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207