MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400365742 · doi:10.5194/ems2024-148

Differences in modelled pavement temperature at German Road Weather Stations

2024· preprint· en· W4400365742 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
S. Trepte, Ralf W. Schmitz

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSmart Materials for Construction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanMeteorologyEnvironmental scienceTransport engineeringGeographyEngineeringArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Canadian Meteorological Service's road surface model METRo is used by the DWD to simulate road surface temperatures at around 1,500 road weather stations (RWS). The modelled road temperature from METRo, together with other meteorological parameters from Model Output Statistics (MOS), is displayed on operational websites of winter services such as Autobahn GmbH.The MOS provides a combined statistical interpretation of the IFS-HRES (ECMWF) and ICON (DWD) model forecasts at individual weather stations. The technique is based on multiple linear regressions by minimizing the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). A wide range of model variables are used as predictors, including unobserved variables, as well as surface observations, precipitation radar and lightning detection for nowcasting.The MOS is used to apply forecasted variables, such as air temperature, dew point, and precipitation parameters, to the METRo. The METRo then calculates the pavement temperature for the next seven days.The RWS provide temperature data from federal roads, country roads, and international airports. The data undergo automated plausibility checks and are used to train the MOS and in METRo's data assimilation.The MOS also calculates pavement temperatures. However, it has not been used operationally in the past due to a lack of quality testing. Thanks to years of automatically quality-assured measurement data at the RWS, the MOS can simulate the road temperature fairly well.The RMSE was used to evaluate the accuracy of the METRo and MOS forecasts. It was based on 2.2 million quality-assured measured and modelled pavement temperatures at around 1,100 RWS stations between November 2023 and January 2024.The RMSE was averaged over forecast times covering the next day and night, which is crucial for winter services. METRo's RMSE is 1.5°C, indicating high prediction accuracy given the pavement temperature measurement. MOS predictions are even better, with a calculated RMSE of 1.3°C. The largest differences between the models occur at noon and at night. Both models' forecasts are more accurate in regions of Germany where the data quality and quantity of observed pavement temperature at the RWS is higher.Automated plausibility checks are crucial, as demonstrated by experiences with pavement forecasting in operational and pre-operational mode. If such checks are in place, a MOS can outperform a physical model, even with parameters that are difficult to observe. This is especially relevant for future developments in the field of AI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Materials for ConstructionFrench-language works237,207