MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400378709 · doi:10.53560/ppasa(61-2)832

Design and Development of Fractional Order Convolutional Neural Network Based Fractional Order Nonlinear Reactor Power Simulator for CANDU-PHWR

2024· article· en· W4400378709 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Arshad Habib Malik, Feroza Arshad, Aftab Ahmad Memon

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of Pakistan Academy of Sciences A Physical and Computational Sciences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear reactor physics and engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonlinear systemOrder (exchange)Power (physics)Nuclear engineeringComputer scienceSimulationEngineeringPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A highly complex nonlinear Reactor Regulating System (RRS) of Canadian Deuterium Uranium Pressurized Heavy Water Reactor (CANDU-PHWR) based Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) simulated in the present research. The internal design of RRS is secured and vendor controlled which is embedded in AC-132 Programmable Logic Controller (PLC). Therefore, the problem of the identification of the RRS controller model is addressed. A data-driven Fractional Order Nonlinear MIMO Hammerstein Model (FO-NC-MIMO-HM) of NPP is identified using an Adaptive Immune Algorithm (AIA) based on a Global Search Strategy (GSS) and Auxiliary Model Recursive Least Square Method (AMRLSM). Parameters of FO-MIMO-HM are identified using Innovative Real-Time Plant Operational Data (IRTPOD). The original PLC-based controller is replaced with a new Fractional Order Convolutional Neural Network (FO-CNN) based Fractional Order Nonlinear Controller (FO-NC). Therefore, a visual Simulator is developed for detailed modeling, control, simulation, and analysis of the proposed design scheme for RRS in Visual Basic (VB) Software. The performance of the proposed design scheme is tested and validated for different modes of RRS against benchmark data obtained from Plant Data Recorder (PDR) and found in close agreement well within the design bounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.452

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of Pakistan Academy of Sciences A Physical and Computational SciencesSame topicNuclear reactor physics and engineeringFrench-language works237,207