MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400387299 · doi:10.7759/cureus.63940

A Novel Gum Paint Formulation Derived From Licorice and Triphala: Characteristics and Clinical Significance for Improved Oral Health

2024· article· en· W4400387299 on OpenAlexaff
Neha Kannan, S. Gheena, Pratibha Ramani, Karthikeyan Ramalingam

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds
Canadian institutionsCentre for Global Health Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTerminalia chebulaTraditional medicineGlycyrrhizaAntimicrobialPhyllanthus emblicaStatistical significanceBrine shrimpCombretaceaePharmacologyAlternative medicineInternal medicineMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The clinical use of antimicrobial agents for managing aphthous ulcers and periodontal diseases has long been a subject of intensive research by numerous investigators. As concerns over the side effects and antibiotic resistance associated with conventional therapies persist, there has been a concerted effort to explore alternative medicinal approaches. In line with this objective, our study introduces a novel herbal gum paint designed specifically to address the therapeutic needs of individuals suffering from oral ulcers and periodontal diseases. Materials and methods: The herbal formulation utilized in our study was prepared using extracts derived from Licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra) and Triphala, a combination of three fruits: Emblica officinalis, Terminalia chebula, and Terminalia belerica. These ingredients were selected based on their documented medicinal properties. The preparation process involved extraction and formulation techniques optimized for maximum efficacy. Antimicrobial activity was assessed using the bacterial culture method, where the formulation’s ability to inhibit the growth of specific bacterial strains relevant to oral health was tested. Meanwhile, cytotoxicity was evaluated using the Brine Shrimp Assay method. Statistical analysis was conducted using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey post hoc test to validate the significance of our findings with statistical significance set at p<0.05. Results: The formulation exhibited significant activity against microbes when compared to the control. The cytotoxic activity was present at a concentration of 60 and 80µL, which indicated safe usage within specified concentration ranges, highlighting its potential for clinical application without adverse effects on biological systems. Statistically significant differences were obtained between the antimicrobial activity of the formulated gum paint and the commercial gum paint against Candida albicans species at 25 µL and 80 µL (p=0.00). Conclusion: The study underscores the promising therapeutic potential of the herbal gum paint developed in this research. By harnessing the natural antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties of Licorice and Triphala, the formulated gum paint showed efficacy against C. albicans. These findings contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting the integration of herbal remedies into mainstream oral healthcare practices. Future investigations could further elucidate the mechanisms underlying its therapeutic actions and explore its broader clinical applications in diverse patient populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.567
Threshold uncertainty score0.941

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.206
GPT teacher head0.502
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicPharmacological Effects of Natural CompoundsFrench-language works237,207