Saccade and pupil changes in children recovering from opsoclonus‐myoclonus ataxia syndrome reveal midbrain alterations in oculomotor circuits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective This study measured eye movements in children with a history of opsoclonus‐myoclonus ataxia syndrome in order to identify abnormalities in saccade and pupil behavior that map onto specific alterations in brainstem pathways. Methods We used video‐based eye tracking while participants freely viewed 10 min of short (2–4 s) video clips without instructions. Clip transitions represented a large visual perturbation and we quantified multiple characteristics of saccade and pupil responses following these transitions in 13 children recovering from opsoclonus‐myoclonus and 13 healthy, age‐matched control participants. Results The frequency of saccades and distribution of fixation durations differed between the groups. Following the clip transitions, children recovering from opsoclonus‐myoclonus ataxia syndrome exhibited longer time to initiate saccades, leading to a delay in harvesting visual information. Clip transitions to lighter clips produced similar pupil constriction responses in the two groups. However, clip transitions to darker clips produced dilation responses that were initiated earlier and of greater magnitude in opsoclonus‐myoclonus ataxia syndrome, suggesting removal or suppression of a signal that delays dilation. Interpretation Children with a history of opsoclonus‐myoclonus ataxia syndrome demonstrated key abnormalities in saccade and pupil metrics. We propose a novel hypothesis in which dysfunction in the pathway from the superior colliculus to the mesencephalic and pontine reticular formation that houses the saccade and pupil premotor circuits could produce these results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".