MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400402121 · doi:10.1002/lpor.202301335

Efficient Poling‐Free Wavelength Conversion in Thin Film Lithium Niobate Harnessing Bound States in the Continuum

2024· article· en· W4400402121 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jackson Jacob Chakkoria, Rifat Ahmmed Aoni, Aditya Dubey, Guanghui Ren, Thach G. Nguyen, Andreas Boes, Shankar Kumar Selvaraja, Arnan Mitchell

Bibliographic record

VenueLaser & Photonics Review · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRMIT UniversityAustralian National Fabrication FacilityOntario Ministry of Natural Resources and ForestryIndian Institute of Science
KeywordsPolingLithium niobateMaterials scienceWavelengthOpticsOptoelectronicsThin filmNonlinear opticsFerroelectricityNanotechnologyPhysicsLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Over the past two decades, there has been a surge of interest in photonic integrated circuits (PICs) to enable low‐cost industrial mass manufacture of miniaturized optical systems while simultaneously improving performance and energy efficiency following the trajectory of electronics and large‐scale integration. An essential characteristic of any PIC lies in the ability of waveguides to efficiently confine light. The phenomenon of bound states in the continuum (BIC) shows promise in achieving confinement of light for modes that otherwise would suffer from high leakage losses, which can occur in many PIC platforms. In this contribution, the usefulness of operating near a BIC to achieve efficient second harmonic generation of ≈300% W−1 cm−2 in Silicon Nitride (SiN) loaded lithium niobate on insulator (LNOI) waveguides without needing to either pole or etch the lithium niobate is experimentally demonstrated. The guided fundamental mode is phase matched at the telecom wavelength to a higher order mode at the second harmonic wavelength that is engineered as a bound state in the continuum to mitigate leakage losses. This demonstrates the promise of using BIC in weakly confining waveguides for nonlinear optical applications all while avoiding the poling process by engineering waveguide geometry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLaser & Photonics ReviewSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207