MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400407504 · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c00285

Thermomechanical Properties of Transition Metal Dichalcogenides Predicted by a Machine Learning Parameterized Force Field

2024· article· en· W4400407504 on OpenAlexaff
Mehboob Ali, Hoang T. Nguyen, Jeffrey T. Paci, Yue Zhang, Horacio D. Espinosa

Bibliographic record

VenueNano Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchDivision of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing InnovationOffice of Naval Research
KeywordsTransition metalForce field (fiction)Parameterized complexityMaterials scienceField (mathematics)NanotechnologyChemical physicsCondensed matter physicsChemistryComputer sciencePhysicsMathematicsArtificial intelligenceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mechanical and thermal properties of transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) are directly relevant to their applications in electronics, thermoelectric devices, and heat management systems. In this study, we use a machine learning (ML) approach to parametrize molecular dynamics (MD) force fields to predict the mechanical and thermal transport properties of a library of monolayered TMDs (MoS 2, MoTe 2, WSe 2, WS 2, and ReS 2 ). The ML-trained force fields were then employed in equilibrium MD simulations to calculate the lattice thermal conductivities of the foregoing TMDs and to investigate how they are affected by small and large mechanical strains. Furthermore, using nonequilibrium MD, we studied thermal transport across grain boundaries. The presented approach provides a fast albeit accurate methodology to compute both mechanical and thermal properties of TMDs, especially for relatively large systems and spatially complex structures, where density functional theory computational cost is prohibitive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.464

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNano LettersSame topicAdvanced Thermoelectric Materials and DevicesFrench-language works237,207