MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Molecular residual disease (MRD) interception in locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC): MERIDIAN study.

2024· article· en· W4400408056 on OpenAlexaff
Enrique Sanz Garcia, Anna Spreafico, Ali Hosni, Andrew McPartlin, C. Jillian Tsai, Lawson Eng, M. Zurita Herrera, David P. Goldstein, Andrew Hope, John R. de Almeida, Ezra Hahn, Christopher M. K. L. Yao, John Waldron, Bayardo Perez‐Ordoñez, Patricia Inocillas, Bana Ambasager, Christopher Gareth Smith, Scott V. Bratman, Lillian L. Siu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHead and neck squamous-cell carcinomaOncologyBasal cellInternal medicineHead and neckMinimal residual diseaseHead and neck cancerCancer researchRadiation therapySurgeryLeukemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS6122 Background: The detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) after definitive treatment or MRD is associated with recurrence across different tumor types. We previously showed that ctDNA detection using a bespoke tumor-informed assay (RaDaR), in LA-HNSCC patients (pts) after surgery, definitive radiation (RT) or chemoRT (CRT), is associated with recurrence within a year (Sanz-Garcia et al, ASCO 2023). To date, the impact of intercepting MRD prior to progression in HNSCC has not been explored. Anti-PD-1 blockade has shown benefit in recurrent/metastatic HNSCC but the efficacy in LA-HNSCC is still uncertain. TIGIT is overexpressed in HNSCC and could be a potential target to improve immunotherapy (IO) outcomes. Rilvegostomig (AZD2936) is a monovalent bispecific TIGIT/PD-1 antibody that has shown acceptable safety in phase I studies, currently in phase III studies. We hypothesize that IO (AZD2936) could induce ctDNA clearance post-definitive treatment and avoid, or delay recurrence. Methods: This study will recruit 200 pts with high-risk LA-HNSCC treated with curative intent: surgery ± adjuvant therapy, definitive RT or CRT; stage III Human Papilloma virus (HPV) positive or III-IVB HPV negative. Archival tissue must be available for whole exome sequencing (WES). Pts will be enrolled in part A (definitive therapy) and part B (follow up – FU - post-definitive therapy). Plasma samples will be collected in part A (pre-treatment and post-surgery prior to adjuvant therapy) and part B (at 4-6 weeks: FU1 and 8-12 weeks: FU2). These FU samples will be analyzed in real time for ctDNA using RaDaR, an assay that targets patient specific somatic variants identified by WES of matched tumor tissue. MRD+ pts (defined as having ctDNA detected at FU2) will be enrolled to part C (interception) and randomized 3:1 to receive AZD2936 750mg IV q3w for 6 cycles or observation. 30% of pts (N=60) will be enrolled in part C. Tumor must be positive for PD-L1 (CPS≥1) and there should not be residual primary tumor or distant metastases at FU2; residual lymph nodes are allowed if neck dissection is performed. Part D will consist of long term FU of MRD+ pts; RaDaR will be performed at week 2 (W2) and week 10 (W10), and radiological assessments will be performed at W2. MRD- pts will be enrolled in part E (long term FU). The primary endpoint of MERIDIAN is ctDNA clearance in MRD+ pts, defined as no detection of ctDNA at Part D W2 and W10. We will have 87% power to identify a significant improvement in ctDNA clearance rate from 10% (observation) to 40% (AZD2936) given a significance level of 0.1. Secondary objectives include survival and safety. Exploratory analyses include: ctDNA detection using other assays (HPV DNA, methylated ctDNA), ctDNA detection in part E and beyond W10 in part D, quality of life assessments (FACT-ICM, EORTC-HN43), health economics and radiomics. As of February 2024, 19 patients are recruited. Clinical trial information: 05414032.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.468
Teacher spread0.421 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations→French-language works237,207→