Association of bronchial disease on CT imaging and clinical definitions of chronic bronchitis in a single-center COPD phenotyping study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Chronic Bronchitis (CB) represents a phenotype of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). While several definitions have been used for diagnosis, the relationship between clinical definitions and radiologic assessment of bronchial disease (BD) has not been well studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between three clinical definitions of CB and radiographic findings of BD in spirometry-defined COPD patients. Methods A cross-sectional analysis was performed from a COPD phenotyping study. It was a prospective observational cohort. Participants had spirometry-defined COPD and available chest CT imaging. Comparison between CB definitions, Medical Research Council (CB MRC ), St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (CB SGRQ ), COPD Assessment Test (CB CAT ) and CT findings were performed using Cohen's Kappa, univariate and multivariate logistic regressions. Results Of 112 participants, 83 met inclusion criteria. Demographics included age of 70.1 ± 7.0 years old, predominantly male (59.0 %), 45.8 ± 30.8 pack-year history, 21.7 % actively smoking, and mean FEV 1 61.5 ± 21.1 %. With MRC, SGRQ and CAT definitions, 22.9 %, 36.6 % and 28.0 % had CB, respectively. BD was more often present in CB compared to non-CB patients; however, it did not have a statistically significant relationship between any of the CB definitions. CB SGRQ had better agreement with radiographically assessed BD compared to the other two definitions. Conclusion Identification of BD on CT was associated with the diagnoses of CB. However, agreement between imaging and definitions were not significant, suggesting radiologic findings of BD and criteria defining CB may not identify the same COPD phenotype. Research to standardize imaging and clinical methods is needed for more objective identification of COPD phenotypes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".