DNA repair and replicative stress addiction in neuroblastoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neuroblastoma (NB) is a pediatric tumor of the sympathetic nervous system. Survival remains poor for the almost 40 % of patients with high-risk NB. Targeted therapy options for high-risk NB are limited and single compound strategies often fail due to escape mechanisms, driven either by tumor heterogeneity or adaptive (epigenetic) responses or mutations. Novel NB therapeutic approaches rely increasingly on biomarker selected cohorts for phase I/II clinical trials. Parallel intensive research programs are needed to identify novel therapeutic vulnerabilities or drug targeting strategies and to further inform clinical trials and prioritize potent, less toxic combinations. While several effective chemotherapies work by increasing replication stress in cancer cells, recently, newer putatively less toxic small molecule-based approaches that directly target DNA damage response (DDR) pathway components such as ATR, CHK1 and PARP inhibitors are being evaluated in early phase trials for many cancers. NB sequencing studies have identified recurrent alterations (copy number and mutations) in many of these genes encoding critical DDR pathway proteins suggesting susceptibility to specific classes of DDR-targeting therapies. In this review, we summarize current data supporting the roles of DDR and replicative stress addiction in NB, including genetic alterations which impact DDR signaling pathways. Finally, we review the mechanisms, pre-clinical evidence and ongoing trials for drugs that target DDR-deficient and/or replication addicted NB.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".