Cognitive, Emotional, and Behavioral Disorders in Children with Respiratory Allergic Diseases: Causes and Solutions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The publication is devoted to the review of accumulated data on the relationship of respiratory allergopathology with neuropsychiatric disorders in childhood. The immediacy of the problem is due to the mutual influence of allergic and neuropsychiatric conditions combined in a child on the course of these diseases. According to research, the connection of respiratory allergic diseases with disorders of neurodevelopment, in particular with attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorders, is clearly manifested, and the first publications on the connection with speech and other mild cognitive impairments have appeared. At the same time, the formation of depression, suicidal behavior, and anxiety disorders in respiratory allergopathology is being actively studied. It is assumed that the close relationship between nervous and immune regulation provides a high correlation of allergic and neuropsychiatric pathological conditions, although cause-and-effect relationships have not yet been precisely established. In this regard, it becomes relevant to introduce into clinical practice monitoring of cognitive status, neuropsychic development and possible symptoms of anxiety, depression and suicidal thoughts in the treatment of children with respiratory allergic diseases. Timely detection of violations will make it possible to provide specialized interventions at an early stage in order to achieve a favorable treatment result in the long term.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".