MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400421028 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-gq507

A method to measure total gaseous fluorine

2024· preprint· en· W4400421028 on OpenAlexaff
RenXi Ye, Teles C. Furlani, Andrew P. Folkerson, Scott A. Mabury, Trevor C. VandenBoer, Cora J. Young

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeasure (data warehouse)FluorineEnvironmental scienceChemistryComputer scienceOrganic chemistryData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Total fluorine (TF) analysis is a powerful tool for the characterization of organofluorine contaminants in the environment. Organofluorine compounds are known primarily with respect to the notorious subgroup of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and as potent greenhouse gases that can impact climate. The use of targeted methods for every organofluorine compound in the environment is not feasible. While methods are available for TF analysis of condensed phase samples, no technique exists for gas phase TF measurements (TFg). Herein we demonstrate an in-situ instrumental method for TFg via platinum catalyzed thermolysis at 1000 °C in the presence of propane. TFg is fully converted into HF and subsequently quan-tified by existing techniques for F-. The method was validated using nine organofluorine compounds with differing functional groups. We characterized TFg and compared to common speciated measurements in the headspace of four commercial fluorosurfactants and outdoor air. Most TFg (65%-99.8%) in the fluoro-surfactant headspace was unknown. In outdoor air, >50% of TFg was unknown. These high quantities of unknown organofluorine indicate a measurement gap in the gas phase, which could have important impli-cations for atmospheric sources and burdens of PFAS and fluorinated greenhouse gases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.023
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.518
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0230.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.346
GPT teacher head0.464
Teacher spread0.118 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicScientific Measurement and Uncertainty EvaluationFrench-language works237,207