MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400421593 · doi:10.1002/vrc2.924

Acquired uretero‐jejunal fistula following surgical excision of a subcutaneous, metastatic mast cell tumour in a dog

2024· article· en· W4400421593 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Natalie Heathcote, Petros Frezoulis, Naomi Shimizu

Bibliographic record

VenueVeterinary Record Case Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVeterinary Oncology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgical excisionFistulaMast cellPathologySurgeryImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An 8‐year‐old, female, neutered labrador retriever presented for surgical excision of a subcutaneous mast cell tumour and extirpation of the right inguinal and right medial iliac lymph nodes. Histology confirmed a completely excised, low mitotic count subcutaneous mast cell tumour with lymph node metastasis. Vinblastine and prednisolone were administered as adjunctive chemotherapy. Six weeks post‐operatively, the dog presented dehydrated, tachycardic and pyrexic, with haematochezia, vomiting and abdominal pain. Coeliotomy revealed a communication between the jejunum and the proximal right ureter, with no obvious aetiology identified. Right ureteronephrectomy was performed, with debridement and closure of the affected jejunum. Histopathology reported a subacute to chronic neutrophilic and necrohaemorrhagic pyelonephritis and haemolytic Escherichia coli , resistant to amoxicillin clavulanate, was cultured. The dog recovered and re‐started the chemotherapy protocol following restaging 2 months post‐operatively. Unfortunately, 7 weeks after starting this protocol, the patient developed acute necrotising pancreatitis following dietary indiscretion and was electively euthanased.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVeterinary Record Case ReportsSame topicVeterinary Oncology ResearchFrench-language works237,207