The Vantage Point: Perspectives of Mental Health Experiences at Work
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mental illness is a common health impairment, and in a given year, 1 in 5 North Americans will experience a mental-health-related concern. Although prevalent, stigma surrounding mental health remains a pervasive workplace challenge which negatively impacts employment for those facing mental-health challenges, such as mental illness. In addition, a lack of mental-health related support in the workplace contributes to lost productivity which can be costly to organizations. Given the pervasiveness and costs associated with mental health, there is a need to better understand employees' mental health experiences in the workplace context. The papers in our symposium contribute to the prominent body on mental health in the workplace, emphasizing employees' experience of mental health at work and the implications on job attitudes and performance. Each paper provides a unique perspective, including how experiencing mental-health-related stigma can affect leader emergence, how mental health can affect leadership pursuit, why managers' responses to poor mental health are essential to enhance employees' well-being, and what organizations can do to cultivate a supportive mental health environment. The symposium will conclude with a discussion on what organizational leaders can do to promote good mental health and prevent poor mental health, providing valuable insight for practitioners and researchers. The Bright and Dark Sides of Personal Stigma and Leadership Emergence Author: Michaela Scanlon; Smith School of Business, Queen's U. Author: Julian Barling; Queen's U. Mental Health and Leadership Pursuit Author: Anika Cloutier; Rowe School of Business, Dalhousie U. Author: Alyson Byrne; Memorial U. of Newfoundland Author: Cindy D. Suurd Ralph; Royal Military College of Canada Employees' Perspectives on Why their Managers’ Supportive Actions Benefit their Mental Health Author: Daniel James Quintal-Curcic; Telfer School of Management, U. of Ottawa Author: Laurent Lapierre; Telfer School of Management, U. of Ottawa Workplace Mental Health Environment: Conceptual Development Author: Mikaila Ortynsky; Telfer School of Management, U. of Ottawa Author: Jennifer Dimoff; Telfer School of Management, U. of Ottawa
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.014 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".