Developing Development: Beliefs and Behaviors Driving the Provision of Feedback, Advice, & Coaching
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this symposium, we consider the beliefs and behaviors that impact how leaders provide development, ultimately aiming to help leaders create more developmental organizations. In particular, we advance research on developing development by examining how these core beliefs and behaviors underlie the following questions:1) What are the different forms of developmental activities that enable individuals to learn and grow? 2) Who can provide sources of development?, and 3) How is development provided? ). The symposium program brings together research on feedback, advice, and coaching, and considers activities ranging from informal interactions (e.g., seeking feedback or advice) to formalized processes (e.g., annual feedback processes and structured coaching conversations). By bringing together these papers, we enable our field to think more holistically about the wide range of ways people receive development in organizational life with an eye towards improving its outcomes. The Dark Side of Transmitting the Culture in Feedback Author: Paul Isaac Green; U. of Texas at Austin Author: Min Ju Lee; UT Austin Author: Constantinos V. Coutifaris; McCombs School of Business, U. of Texas at Austin Feedback Intuitions Across the East and West Author: Yena Kim; U. of Chicago Booth School of business Author: Raye Zhu; Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern U. Author: Emma Levine; U. Of Chicago Author: Thomas Talhelm; U. of Chicago Booth School of business Author: Thomas Bradford Bitterly; HKUST Business School People Use More Second-Person and Fewer Impersonal Pronouns in Positive vs. Critical Feedback Author: ZhengPeng(Matt) Wang; U. of Toronto Author: Nicole Abi-Esber; Harvard Business School Author: Hayley Blunden; American U., Kogod School of Business Reverse the Curse of Failure: Learning Cues Increase Willingness to Seek (and Share) Failures Author: Xiawei Dong; Hong Kong U. of Science and Technology Author: Martha Jeong; Hong Kong U. of Science and Technology Author: Shaocong Ma; - The Role of Managers’ Developmental Beliefs in Coaching Author: Bushra Sarah Guenoun; Harvard Business School Author: Ting Zhang; Harvard Business School
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".