<i>Education and the Politics of Difference: Canadian Perspectives.</i> by R. Ghosh & A.A. Abdimatical
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A Comparison of Hispanic Refugee Parents' and Adolescents' Accuracy in Judging Family Cultural ViewsThe Canadian school system requires refugee adolescents to develop the language, cross-cultural interaction skills, and direct modes of expression necessary for academic success.As peers become the agents of socialization into the host culture, adolescents may not attend to parents' differential levels of receptiveness to changes away from their cultural heritage.In this study 50 Hispanic refugee parent-adolescent dyads rated the acceptability of 24 cultural shifts from their own perspective and the perspective of the other family member.Adolescents were poorer judges of family cultural views than their parents, creating potential for family conflict when school-based changes occur at home.Le système scolaire canadien exige que les réfugiés adolescents développent la langue, les habiletés en interaction interculturelle et les modes directes d'expression qui sont nécessaires pour réussir sur le plan académique.Les pairs étant les agents de socialisation vers la culture d'accueil, il se peut que les adolescents et leurs parents perçoivent différemment l'éloignement de leur patrimoine culturel.Cette recherche a analysé les réactions de 50 dyades parents-adolescents de réfugiés hispaniques aux changements culturels.Les réfugiés ont évalué l'acceptabilité de 24 de ces changements, selon leur propre perspective et selon celle de l'autre membre de leur famille.Les adolescents jugeaient moins bien les perspectives culturelles familiales que leurs parents; cet écart pourrait engendrer des conflits familiaux quand des comportements appris à l'école se manifesteront à la maison.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".