MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Conversation Worth Having: The Spillover Effects of Reproductive Health Hardships in the Workplace

2024· article· en· W4400444345 on OpenAlexaff
Justin Peyton Woodall, Ivona Hideg, Janet A. Boekhorst, Laura M. Little, Serena Sohrab, Nada Basir, Jamie Ladge, Allison S. Gabriel, Kristen M. Shockley, Aqsa Dutli, Hope Dodd, Nitya Chawla, Yu Tse Heng, Beth S. Schinoff, Kristen P. Jones, Abbie Griffith Oliver

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademy of Management Proceedings · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEmployment and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConversationSpillover effectPsychologySocial psychologyBusinessEconomicsCommunicationMicroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although work-family researchers have made meaningful progress in understanding how parental and pregnancy experiences affect work, little has been done to understand the affects that reproductive health issues, including infertility, IVF, and miscarriage, have on employees at work. This symposium brings together four insightful empirical studies that examine the complex interplay between employees’ reproductive challenges and their professional lives. In doing so, this symposium begins an important and much-needed dialogue on the challenges that these hardships present to employees and the ways that they spillover into the work domain. By highlighting the need for innovative organizational policies and practices that are more inclusive of and supportive towards employees confronted with these challenges, this symposium strongly aligns itself with the Academy of Management’s 2024 conference theme of “Innovating for the Future: Policy, Purpose, and Organizations. Feeling Torn and Stuck: A Qualitative Investigation of Infertility Experiences Among Women and Men Author: Janet Boekhorst; U. of Waterloo Author: Laura McAndrews Little; U. of Georgia Author: Justin Peyton Woodall; U. of Georgia The Labors We Can't See: The Impact of Infertility on Women's Careers Author: Serena Sohrab; Bayes Business School Author: Nada Basir; U. of Waterloo Author: Jamie Jocelyn Ladge; Boston College From Grief to Hope and Back Again: The Emotional Complexities of Infertility Journeys at Work Author: Allison S. Gabriel; Purdue U., West Lafayette Author: Kristen Michelle Shockley; Auburn U. Author: Aqsa Dutli; Purdue U., West Lafayette Author: Hope Dodd; U. of Georgia Author: Beth Buchanan; - Understanding Working Women's Miscarriage Experiences Author: Nitya Chawla; U. of Minnesota, Twin Cities Author: Yu Tse Heng; U. of Virginia - McIntire School of Commerce Author: Beth Schinoff; U. of Delaware Author: Kristen Price Jones; U. of Memphis Author: Abbie Griffith Oliver; U. of Virginia

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0330.027
Scholarly communication0.0120.014
Open science0.0020.017
Research integrity0.0050.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcademy of Management ProceedingsSame topicEmployment and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207