MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cultivating Innovation From Within: Internal Consultancy’s Pivotal Role in Organizational Futures

2024· article· en· W4400446564 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademy of Management Proceedings · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Development and Digital Transformation
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFutures contractBusinessKnowledge managementBusiness administrationManagementEconomicsComputer scienceFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Throughout the annals of organizational history, the role of internal consultants has quietly steered the course of success in organizations, often playing pivotal roles in shaping strategy, solving complex challenges, and fostering change. Today, as the ever-evolving landscape of work and technology reshapes the organizational paradigm, the future of internal consultancy shines with unparalleled promise. This confluence of human expertise and emerging trends opens new frontiers, offering internal consultants an unprecedented opportunity to embrace dynamic roles enriched by cutting-edge technologies and innovative methodologies. “Internal consultants: The driving force behind organizational innovation and success,” a new addition to David Szabla’s Research in Management Consulting book series, will be published in the fall of 2024. The chapters in this volume delve into the timeless wisdom of internal consultancy and its seamless integration with future trends exploring the accelerating strategic importance of internal consulting capabilities in fostering innovation, adaptability and transformation competencies vital to navigating uncertainty and complexity. This timely panel symposium affords the opportunity for contributing authors to situate their work and thoughts within the broader themes of the book and interact with fellow thought leaders- scholars and practitioners- to further the discussion of the power, possibilities, and challenges of internal consultants. As the landscape of technology and work evolves, panelists will highlight how an array of pivotal roles across functions are integrating consultative mindsets marked by systems thinking, cross-boundary collaboration, and change leadership expertise. Further, panelists will discuss their chapter contributions and innovative frameworks for how diverse intrapreneurial perspectives can intersect with emerging trends such as public sector reforms, talent pathway cultivation, and equity culture shifts to drive enterprise resilience and progress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.241
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it