MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400462700 · doi:10.3329/jdmc.v31i2.73126

Assessment of Quality of Life Among Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

2024· article· en· W4400462700 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Md Hasibul Islam, Badrunnesa Ahmed, Mohammad Shafiqul Alam, Lilian Catherene Gomes, Md Nuruzzaman Khandaker, Md Khairul Islam

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dhaka Medical College · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineWOMACOsteoarthritisStatistical significancePhysical therapyQuality of life (healthcare)Observational studyGrading (engineering)Inclusion and exclusion criteriaInternal medicineAlternative medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease estimated to be the fourth leading cause of disability. Methodology: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study at BSMMU, Dhaka, from April 2018 to March 2019. Our goal was to evaluate the quality of life in knee OA patients in Bangladesh using Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index. We collected data through face-to-face interviews, adhering to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: Most participants were within the 40-59 year age group, with 65.2% of patients reporting a disease duration of 1-5 years. The mean WOMAC scores differed significantly by age (p=0.001), with older patients having higher scores. Gender and monthly income did not significantly impact WOMAC scores (p>0.05). Educational status showed potential significance (p=0.074), but it did not reach statistical significance. There was a strong statistical association between total WOMAC scores and patient age (p=0.001). However, other socio-demographic factors showed no significant differences (p>0.05). Patients with shorter OA knee durations (less than one year) had notably lower WOMAC scores than those with longer durations (1-5 years), with a significant difference (F=16.513, p<0.001). In terms of OA knee grading, patients with more severe OA (grade III) had significantly higher WOMAC scores than those with less severe OA (grade I or II) (F=190.077, p<0.001). Gender, educational status, and monthly income significantly influenced SF-36 scores in knee OA patients. Male patients and those with higher educational levels reported higher SF-36 scores. Monthly income also had a significant effect (F=6.101, p=0.004), with higher income linked to higher SF-36 scores. Age did not significantly impact SF-36 scores (F=0.492, p=0.614). Body mass index (BMI) did not significantly affect health-related quality of life in OA knee patients. The elderly with more advanced and prolonged disease had lower quality of life according to WOMAC. Conclusion: It can be concluded that patients with OA knee had relatively poor quality of life in physical health component than that of mental health component and role physical domain was mostly affected among all domains. J Dhaka Med Coll. 2022; 31(2) : 201-209

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dhaka Medical CollegeSame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207