Unraveling morphology, methylation profiling, and diagnostic challenges in BRAF-Mutant pediatric glial and glioneuronal tumors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: To elucidate the relationship between DNA methylation profiling (DMP) and pathological diagnosis (PD) in pediatric glial and glioneuronal tumors with B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) mutations, addressing their diagnostic challenges. Methods: This retrospective study, conducted in Saudi Arabia, analyzed 47 cases from the Children’s Brain Tumor Network online database using scanned images, next-generation sequencing data, and methylation profiles processed using the Heidelberg methylation brain tumor classifiers v12.5 and v12.8. The data was last access on 10 November 2023. Results: The highest prevalence of BRAF mutations was observed in pilocytic astrocytoma and ganglioglioma. The DMP was consistent with PD in 23 cases, but discrepancies emerged in others, including diagnostic changes in diffuse leptomeningeal glioneuronal tumor and polymorphous low-grade neuroepithelial tumor of the young. A key inconsistency appeared between a pilocytic astrocytoma MC and a glioneuronal tumor PD. Two high-grade astrocytomas were misclassified as pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas. Additionally, low variant allelic frequency in gangliogliomas likely contributed to misclassifications as control in 5 cases. Conclusion: This study emphasized the importance of integrating DMP with PD in diagnosing pediatric glial and glioneuronal tumors with BRAF mutations. Although DMP offers significant diagnostic insights, its limitations, particularly in cases with low tumor content, necessitate cautious interpretation, as well as its use as a complementary diagnostic tool, rather than a definitive method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".