Exploring the Role of Digital Transformation in Procurement: Voices from Industry Leaders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This qualitative research explores the role of digital transformation in procurement through insights gathered from interviews with industry leaders. Digital technologies such as Robotic Process Automation (RPA), Big Data Analytics, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Blockchain are examined for their impact on operational efficiency, strategic procurement management, supplier relationships, and sustainability practices. Findings reveal that these technologies streamline processes, enhance decision-making capabilities, and improve transparency, thereby enabling organizations to achieve greater agility and competitive advantage. Strategic factors including leadership commitment, strategic investments, and digital skills development emerge as crucial for navigating challenges such as organizational resistance, data security, and integration complexities. The study underscores the transformative potential of digital transformation in procurement, emphasizing its role in driving innovation, fostering sustainability, and aligning procurement practices with broader organizational goals. Looking forward, the research suggests that organizations must continue to innovate and adapt to technological advancements to maintain resilience and leadership in a digital economy. By integrating digital strategies effectively, organizations can enhance operational efficiencies, strengthen supplier relationships, and promote ethical business practices, ultimately positioning themselves for sustained success.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".