MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400476671 · doi:10.1142/s0217984924504748

Highly dispersive eighth-order embedded solitons with cubic–quartic χ(2) and χ(3) nonlinear susceptibilities under the influence of multiplicative white noise using Itô calculus

2024· article· en· W4400476671 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Physics Letters B · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNonlinear Waves and Solitons
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuartic functionSolitonContext (archaeology)Nonlinear systemMultiplicative functionPhysicsNoise (video)White noiseField (mathematics)Mathematical analysisMathematicsTheoretical physicsQuantum mechanicsComputer sciencePure mathematicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research explores the intriguing realm of eighth-order embedded solitons in highly dispersive media with cubic–quartic nonlinear susceptibilities [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], all within the dynamic context of multiplicative white noise and the framework of Itô calculus. Two different approaches are used in this study. The new auxiliary equation approach produces the bright soliton and singular soliton solutions, while the addendum Kudryashov’s approach produces the bright soliton, singular soliton and combo bright–singular soliton solutions. The system under investigation and the results documented within this work stand as pioneering and original contributions to the field of nonlinear optics. Furthermore, a collection of 2D, 3D and contour plots is produced to visually represent the spatial distribution and progression of different solutions. This not only contributes to the advancement of nonlinear equations in theory but also offers valuable insights for practical applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.529
Threshold uncertainty score0.820

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it