Internalisasi Konsep Burhani dalam Pembelajaran: Strategi peningkatan Nalar Kritis Siswa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Current education shows that students' critical thinking skills are often underdeveloped due to learning approaches that focus more on knowledge transfer than exploration and problem solving. Burhani epistemology, which emphasises rational and analytical thinking, offers an alternative approach that can improve students'ccritical thinking skills. This study aims to examine how the internalisation of burhani epistemology in learning can improve students' critical thinking skills. The research method used is a qualitative approach with the method of documentation study and literature analysis. The research was conducted by analysing literature review and document analysis of teaching materials. Qualitative data was analysed using thematic analysis techniques. The results showed that the internalisation of burhani epistemology in learning improves students' critical thinking skills. Through the implementation of the burhani concept will have a positive impact on the development of students' reasoning power, learning that involves rational and examination of a problem, the function of reason will automatically be wide open. Through the concept of burhani reasoning, thinking and study are carried out comprehensively on the verses of the Qur'an, of course it can minimise the occurrence of blind taklid to religious teachings, for that learning through the burhani concept will give students more freedom in making discoveries and giving birth to new theories in learning activities. The results of the study confirm that the internalisation of burhani epistemology in learning can have a positive impact on the development of students' critical thinking skills. Recommendations for wider application of this concept as well as training for teachers in the burhani method are suggested to improve the quality of education and maximise students' intellectual potential.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".